Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Get Mad!

This site might be the coolest thing ever. Type in what's making you mad and hit "Go." It'll show up on the page with all the stuff that's making everyone else mad.

Plus the explanatory paragraph on the main page is exactly why I love being angry. I have a friend who's all into philosophy and prides himself on his ability to remain calm and whatnot. I say bullshit. I love getting angry! It gives me the motivation to get shit done!

Go Get Mad!

Faux-Progressive

I lost a friend last weekend. The following is the reason why. He identifies as progressive, but after reading this instant message it will be apparent why he is not. I've changed his screenname because I'm nice like that, and some names have been eliminated, but everything else is as it was written (including typos...). I've put some commentary in there, as well, because without the pretty colors and formatting and actually watching the conversation unfold (timestamps are only useful if you're willing to take the time to read them), AIM conversations can get kind of confusing.

Ex-Friend (1:44:17 AM): Stupid Comedy Central and their constant nighttime Girls Gone Wild commercials
Llencelynn (1:44:26 AM): oh no kidding
Llencelynn (1:44:41 AM): especially ridiculous next to Colbert, an avowed feminist
Ex-Friend (1:44:44 AM): Oh... Man vs. Wild is on
Llencelynn (1:44:45 AM): *flips off comedy central*
Llencelynn (1:44:58 AM): my tv actually isn't plugged in right now
Ex-Friend (1:45:00 AM): hey... no one forced them to take their clothes off.

(I got pissed, here, and started looking for anything I could find online to help me explain just how ridiculous that statement was.)

Llencelynn (1:45:02 AM): and i'm too lazy to set it all back up
Ex-Friend (1:45:23 AM): but I still get sick of seeing it
Llencelynn (1:48:31 AM): i'm looking for a link
Llencelynn (1:58:43 AM): This isn't directly about Girls Gone Wild, but it applies, and is why GGW is a feminist issue.
Llencelynn (1:59:06 AM): And I won't even start in on all the evidence pointing towards how often the GGW performances are coerced.
Ex-Friend (2:01:14 AM): I'm sure they are coerced and egged on but in the end they have the right to walk away and say no and not sign the release waiver
Ex-Friend (2:01:23 AM): but they choose not to.
Llencelynn (2:02:11 AM): That doesn't make it right.
Llencelynn (2:02:14 AM): Read the link.
Ex-Friend (2:03:27 AM): Hey, just because people are stupid doesn't make it right for other people to take advantage of them in general.
Ex-Friend (2:03:41 AM): but people do it anyway

(Here, just for clarification, I am quoting back at him how this conversation started.)

Llencelynn (2:04:20 AM): "Ex-Friend (1:44:17 AM): Stupid Comedy Central and their constant nighttime Girls Gone Wild commercials
Llencelynn (1:44:26 AM): oh no kidding
Llencelynn (1:44:41 AM): especially ridiculous next to Colbert, an avowed feminist
Ex-Friend (1:45:00 AM): hey... no one forced them to take their clothes off."

Llencelynn (2:04:31 AM): the point was not whether they were forced or not
Llencelynn (2:04:36 AM): but whether GGW is a feminist issue
Llencelynn (2:04:37 AM): it is
Ex-Friend (2:04:41 AM): No it's not.
Llencelynn (2:04:48 AM): did you read the link?
Ex-Friend (2:04:58 AM): exploitation, unfair treatment, those are feminist issues
Llencelynn (2:04:59 AM): it is SO a feminist issue!
Ex-Friend (2:05:19 AM): stupid girls flashing their tits, those are just stupid people being stupid
Ex-Friend (2:05:30 AM): I just get annoyed with seeing it all the time
Llencelynn (2:05:38 AM): are you going to read that link or not?
Ex-Friend (2:05:42 AM): just like I get annoyed with seeing Cops
Llencelynn (2:05:56 AM): oh, and thanks, by the way, for decided i'm wrong about it being a feminist issue without anything to back up that statement.
Llencelynn (2:06:03 AM): at least i'm trying to show you why i believe it's a feminist issue
Ex-Friend (2:07:18 AM): I don't need to, I've read plenty of these articles bitching about how people are making this stuff and exploiting women. Guess what, those people aren't forced to do it. you want shit like that to stop then convince every woman in the US not to take their clothes off to make a quick buck. Good luck doing that though cuz people are always looking for the easy out and they almost always are going to take it.
Ex-Friend (2:09:30 AM): Now, I don't agree with the videos, nor do I like them, nor will I ever own one (unlike your boyfriend) but I don't blame the people making them for the fact that these stupid chicks are willing to take their clothes off for a little bit of money.
Llencelynn (2:09:31 AM): Doing homework.
Llencelynn (2:11:00 AM): Thanks for the potshot at [beloved]. I'm not trying to bash the people making the videos, the people appearing in them, or the people owning them.
Llencelynn (2:11:05 AM): I'm saying it's a feminist issue.
Llencelynn (2:11:08 AM): Period.
Ex-Friend (2:12:19 AM): feminists always blame "the system" though. Sure, sometimes the system is to blame but even when it's not they still do.
Llencelynn (2:12:46 AM): Oh, I always blame the system? Good to know...
Ex-Friend (2:13:38 AM): pretty much every feminist opinion I've ever listened to or read has.
Llencelynn (2:14:11 AM): Which feminist opinions have you read?
Ex-Friend (2:14:58 AM): none in a couple years. I've gotten sick of reading them.
Ex-Friend (2:15:19 AM): Ever listened to George Carlins rant about feminism?
Llencelynn (2:15:26 AM): Nope.
Ex-Friend (2:15:31 AM): if not. you should go listen to it because that's pretty much how I feel about it.
Llencelynn (2:15:52 AM): I've gotten sick of hearing white straight dudes' opinions of feminism.
Ex-Friend (2:17:47 AM): Carlin isn't exactly your average white straight dude.
Llencelynn (2:18:53 AM): I've rarely been impressed with him.
Ex-Friend (2:19:01 AM): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD5L2CxRMG4
Llencelynn (2:19:40 AM): "I don't need to, I've read plenty of these articles bitching about how [feminists are wrong]."
Ex-Friend (2:19:55 AM): he agrees with a lot of feminist ideology
Ex-Friend (2:20:07 AM): but then just points out a few things where they take it too far.
Llencelynn (2:20:12 AM): They always do.
Ex-Friend (2:20:20 AM): because guess what, they DO take it too far. Just like everyone else.
Ex-Friend (2:20:41 AM): Just because a feminist says its right doesn't make it any more right than when anyone else says something is right.
Llencelynn (2:20:41 AM): Just like white straight dudes who just want their misanthropic behavior to continue unabated.
Ex-Friend (2:26:51 AM): You know what... this is what makes me really sick... When I see a woman who says shes a feminist and wants equal rights but still expects their boyfriend to take them out on a regular basis, and hold the door open for them and pull out their chair and pay for everything. This is where the feminist train ALWAYS derails for me. Basically every one I have ever met want to be equal... EXCEPT where they have the advantage already, that they don't want to change at all. The day I meet the feminist that wants REAL equality where I don't have to treat them like a little fucking princess (outside of the work world of course) is the day that I'll admit that A feminist has it right. Until that day, feminists are no better to me than any other special interest group trying to get themselves pampered more than everyone else.
Llencelynn (2:28:05 AM): Which just goes to show that you don't read any feminist anything ever. Or even anything I say.
Ex-Friend (2:29:01 AM): People can write anything. I don't buy it because of what I've actually seen in real life. People talk the talk but they NEVER fucking walk the walk.
Ex-Friend (2:29:37 AM): I've never seen a feminist taking her boyfriend out and paying for everything. EVER.
Llencelynn (2:29:45 AM): HELLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Llencelynn (2:29:49 AM): <--feminist
Llencelynn (2:29:54 AM): <--does all that shit all the fucking time
Llencelynn (2:29:57 AM): or did, when i had money
Llencelynn (2:30:06 AM): now i don't have to take anyone out
Llencelynn (2:30:43 AM): And how many people do you actually know who self-identify as feminists?
Ex-Friend (2:30:46 AM): Well good for you. I've not exactly ever been in your personal life.
Llencelynn (2:31:03 AM): I know a number I can count on my fingers.
Ex-Friend (2:31:16 AM): A fair amount from Saginaw
Llencelynn (2:31:50 AM): [list of 9 names taken out for privacy]
Llencelynn (2:31:52 AM): that's about it
Ex-Friend (2:31:59 AM): Including [so-and-so] that fucking bitch who used me to get money to fix her car and has now disappeared and I've not seen it back.
Ex-Friend (2:33:32 AM): Who was telling me she liked me while she was sleeping with my friend and mooching off both of us, spending all her money on pot instead of repaying her debts goddamn it AGHHHH she's lucky I don't know where she skipped town to.


That's where the conversation ended. I know this is long, but... GRRR. I don't ever want to speak to him again. I could not believe how he just waltzed over everything I said, negated my existence, my experiences, and my opinions. He's a fucking asshole, and I will never watch that Carlin video, out of pure spite. ^_^

Monday, April 28, 2008

Customers. Ugh.

I'm reading one of those websites where retail/service workers tell horror stories about their jobs - especially the customers. (Link)

It takes me back to my days working at a videogame store in high school. I was the only female employee there.

I was asked out twice while I worked there. I never knew their names. They never bothered to find out I had a boyfriend.

Girl @ Videogame Store = Fair Game, I guess. =/

Sunday, April 27, 2008

I feel I should note...

Old posts about beloved are just that - old. Things move and change and upgrade. This isn't my personal blog, so I don't want to go into detail, but I think it's important to say that I'm only keeping those older posts so I can see where I've been.

Life is good.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Should have done this earlier.

I've had this blog bookmarked for a while, and I check up on it periodically. I should have done a post about it earlier.

It's called "Period Piece: The [largely un-academic] blog that runs concurrently with my honors project regarding the lady-bleeding."

As you may have guessed, yes, this is about menstruation. Rock on! ^_^ Also, we have the same first name!

I don't really have much to add about it except that I love following her project/activities, and she's got some rockin' links and such going on. Check it out!

Friday, April 25, 2008

Okay, maybe I can find the energy.

I Stumbled this comic:




I'm pretty sure this is a visual "reverse-ism" type argument, so I thought I'd talk about it a bit.

To whoever writes that comic, there is a difference. The difference comes from the underlying implications of what each character is saying.

The woman says: "I like a man with nice abs and a nice car... oh! and has to be romantic... and is able to take care of me."

Implication: She wants someone to whom she is attracted, who will pay attention to her emotional needs, and who will support her financially. The last one, while unfair, is a responsibility that The Patriarchy has been very reluctant to give up, so it's your own damn fault, guys. The first is only fair, and the second is just basic human decency. Not too much to ask.

The man says: "Well, I like a woman who can cook."

Implication: I am looking for a housewife. I want an in-house servant to whom I don't have to pay wages. Because of the society we live in, I am leaving unsaid that I probably expect her to do my laundry, raise the children, and generally keep me from being a dipshit and/or slob.

Are these implications fair? No, not really. They're probably not what you meant, either. In fact, more likely than not, you really just hate cooking (I hear you there!) and are hoping for a partner who does like to cook so that you don't live out the rest of your natural lives eating microwave dinners. But, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, we do not live in a vacuum. The expectations that are traditionally placed on a man are given more value than the expectations traditionally placed on a woman. Thus, the traditional expectations for women are sexist, while those for men are not.

For more detail, and a rather more abstract look at this, try the Feminism 101 post about this.

I should also mention that the slightly more applicable explanation for all of this is that the chances of a dude being out on a date with a feminist are slim, and so the lady depicted in this comic, while being correct about the dude being a sexist, has no awareness of her own hypocrisy, and the fact that her stated expectations place an unfair burden on her future partner.

Sigh. I wish I were more coherent. But I'm lazy. ^_^

Probably nifty

But I'm too tired and depressed with personal stuff to actually comment.


Thursday, April 24, 2008

Coolest kids ever?

So my Stumble button brought me to this story about some amazing middle school kids in Massachusetts.

Eighth-grade student Joshua Wolfsun had a meeting with the interim principal Fran Ziperstein earlier in the school year about the school’s Zero Tolerance policy regarding disciplinary matters. Wolfsun was frustrated by the outcome of that meeting, so he and some of his classmates decided to find out what their peers thought.

The group of students spent several weeks conducting interviews with other students at lunch time and compiled their data. They wrote a report for the school paper, The Chestnut Street Journal, which included graphs, student comments and a number of recommendations for improving the situation.

The data that Wolfsun and the other students put together showed that 78% of the students polled do not believe that their voices and ideas were being heard by the school. It also found that 76% think that the disciplinary practices at the Middle School made it a worse place to attend every day, and 65% did not believe that the school’s vision statement portrayed an accurate reflection of the school atmosphere.

When the paper was published, school administration would not allow it to be distributed on campus.


In the article, the writer provides a link to a PDF version of the school newspaper, here. What really struck me about this (aside from the fact that these middle schoolers are WAY more sophisticated than any of the writers, myself included, for the newspaper at my middle school), was a particular statement. The first question of the survey asks the students if they feel the school's vision statement reflects reality. The vision statement is:

Amherst Regional Middle School is a learning community that challenges and supports every member's intellectual, social, emotional and physical growth. It is a safe, creative, and inclusive community that respects and values academic excellence, individual responsibility and life-long learning. Amherst Regional Middle School is a place in which the uniqueness of each individual is recognized, embraced and appreciated.


The question was, "What do you think of the vision statement you just read? Do you think it's true of our school?"

On the first page, in the section "Students Comments to Survey Question #1," one of the comments is:

No - this is adult talk, like they think it's true.


Read that again, I'll wait.

Adult talk. These kids get it. These aren't even the obviously bright students that put together the newspaper. The random selection of students they interviewed get that the vision statement is basically a load of hooey.

...this is adult talk...

I'm struck by the profound, deep truth contained in that statement - enough so that I'm a bit lost for words.

They're in middle school, and they already totally grok how vapid and empty the words of most adults are.

I was going to make a comment about a lot of the mission statements and creeds and whatnot that I've been exposed to by my Army guy, and exactly what I think of those words (some, like my boy, really believe them, but others obviously do NOT), but... These students have said it all.

Rock on.

I have hope for the future.

Sigh.

I was watching TV late last night (my own foolish mistake, I know) and this commercial for Kohler came on. I actually thought it was pretty cute until the end.



After it was over I just found myself generally annoyed and feeling bad. Lots of students here at Tech end up working for Kohler after they graduate. I dunno that I'd want to be a woman working there.

Thoughts?

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Whee, Vaginas!

Okay, so back in March my college put on a production of The Vagina Monologues. We just got the DVD copies of the performance today, and I'm pretty psyched, because I had a ton of fun doing this. Here's my performance.

Monday, April 21, 2008

A little bit of sunshine



My Stumble button brought me here and it made me happy so I thought I'd share.

<3

Sunday, April 20, 2008

RAGE


Okay, Feministing has covered this before, but the relevant link in their Weekly Feminist Reader is broken.

At any rate, I just learned today that Unilever produces both Axe and Dove products.

Hypocritical much?

I'm pretty speechless.

As a random, but related, aside: How do I approach beloved about his use of Axe body wash? If he likes the smell (and it does smell pretty damn good. My first boyfriend used the stuff as well and I liked it then, too), is it fair to ask him to give it up, just for the advertising?

I'll have a go at it...

I'm going to try not to suck at this too badly.

I just StumbleUpon-ed to this. And because I suck at summarizing, here are relevant quotes:

From the moment Justin and I entered the ballroom, the tension was palpable. We received puzzled stares from students sitting around us, and though we couldn't put a finger on why, we felt incredibly unwelcome. I left feeling uncomfortable and unable to make sense of what had happened.

Back in Tri-Towers, when I told my dorm mates where I'd been, I received similar puzzled looks. You went to a BUS event? Hasn't anyone told you about BUS? They don't want white people attending their functions.

...

Boy were we surprised when we were informed by then-leaders Teddy Harris and Demareo Cooper that BUS's goal was not equality, but to advance blacks beyond that of whites. The goal was black-owned, black-operated businesses and universities. When we said,

"... but that's racism ..." we were told that as the majority, we were unable to feel racism. We just couldn't understand.

...

Now, this is not a column bashing BUS for past mistakes. This is a means to a dialog. I truly believe that BUS should embrace its non-black supporters, because there is power in numbers. We support your cause; now can we please be embraced the same way you embrace your black peers?

So this is what I say to you, current members and leaders of BUS: Tell me again. Tell me again what your goals are. I certainly hope they differ from those expressed to me in 2004.

Tell me what you are doing to reach out to non-black students who support your cause. As a straight girl, PRIDE!Kent has always welcomed me to their meetings and functions because they knew I supported their cause. I want to be able to attend BUS functions and feel the same love.

Racism is still a problem in this country, and it will never be solved if we continue to divide black from white. I have been called names and ostracized for the color of my skin, and I have been ridiculed for sharing my life with a man who is not white.

I am not a white bitch. I am a straight, white girl who will always do everything in her power to support the plight of all minorities.

I don't use the color of your skin against you, so please do not use mine against me.

Please, BUS: Tell me how you plan to use your powers for good. I want to hear your voice, and I want to become a united front in the fight against prejudice.

I am not a white bitch. I am not whitey. I am not a cracker. I am not the man.

And I never want to feel ostracized because of my race ever again. Don't you feel the same?


Okay. *deep breath* I sincerely hope that the goal related to this author was not the actual goal of the group. If it was, well... Can I blame them for being angry?

But what really bugged me about this article was that the author seemed to be displaying a number of the attributes of privilege that are no-nos. I'm getting these things-to-watch-for from the Check My What? privilege post at Official Shrub.

1) Using the reverse -ism argument. She was not experiencing racism. Prejudice? Discrimination? Sure. But not something backed up with instituionalized power. So she's obviously not done her privilege research. Most people haven't, I guess, so...

2) "Respect that it's not about you"; "Accept that ranting may be directed at your group"; "Trust needs to be earned" All of these are things that she doesn't seem to really be taking into consideration. Sometimes privileged groups are simply not welcome in minority spaces. Deal. Go find a minority space that is open to the participation of privileged groups. Or start your own (although I'd be leery of a group for a minority founded by one of the "majority").

3) Again, quote from tekanji, "You are not entitled to anything from another human being, so don’t treat minorities like they owe you something - neither an explanation, nor a fuck, nor anything else." Here is the thing that most bothered me. She is asking/demanding that the minority group solve problems / answer questions for her. Rather than seeking out answers on her own time, she wants to be spoon-fed.

I realize that if any of what I said is actually valid, it's very elementary stuff. I'm dipping a toe in the waters, so to speak. Even my analyses of feminist stuff where other oppressions aren't even mentioned aren't that sophisticated. I figure I can start small and work my way up, which is preferable to trying to take on something very complex and nuanced and sticking my foot in my mouth and being shunned by the blogosphere. ^_^

Thanks for listening.

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Hmm.

Looks like I've chosen the right field of physics, if I want to combat gender bias.

=/

Friday, April 18, 2008

I am ambivalent.

About what? Well, about whether I should continue to talk to random folks at my friends' senior barrels or not.

I was told, tonight, by someone whom I do not know (though the party-thrower knew him), "I would like to fuck the shit out of you."

I am fully aware that other women hear this sort of thing a lot. I've led a very sheltered life, what can I say?

My first reaction was a confused/disgusted facial expression. He almost immediately started to backtrack as he realized this statement did not have the desired effect.

It's hearing this sort of thing that makes me not want to go out. It's what follows that makes me think I might want to go out more.

Following this, we managed to have a conversation (as much as one can have with someone who is intoxicated - for the record, I had naught but half a cup of Mountain Dew). A conversation which rambled and stuttered and did things that drunken conversations tend to do, but which ended rather positively.

He explained to me that he used that phrasing intending it as a "high compliment" because it showed the intensity of his feelings. I told him that it didn't make it less creepy (having had a whole conversation thus far trying to explain the creepy, with many tangents involved. It was all I could do not to launch into an explanation of rape culture and the "rape schedule" and whatnot, but again, drunk conversations are neither the time nor the place. Gotta keep it simple. Also, he liked to interrupt me - go figure).

"But don't you want guys to feel passionately about you?"

I replied that it really depends. I explained that I want my boyfriend to feel passionately about me (though I hope to high heaven he never tries to express it in such a way) because I feel passionately about him. But any random fellow at a party, I might not even be interested in him. So, such a fellow should really start of kinda mellow, with something like, "I think you're cute," so that if the girl isn't interested he hasn't put all that out there.

I should note that I am fully aware that this is not the best explanation for why he shouldn't say things like what he said. I know that. There was no way the real explanation was going to hit home with this dude. Also, we talked about a lot more stuff than I'm going to recount here.

The really nifty thing was that at this point, finally, for the first time all night, I thought I saw a light go on. He nodded and said, effectively, "You know, that kinda makes sense." Those weren't his exact words, but that was the message I got from them. Maybe he forgot all of this next morning. But there was something different about the way he responded to that last comment than any of his responses the rest of the evening. I would really like to hope that maybe a little something got through. I high doubt I'll be the last girl he tries that shit on. He's under the impression that, "Girls like to be dominated." You know, because we're all the same and whatnot. Not to mention the fact that regardless of whether a woman actually likes to be dominated, you don't talk like that to someone you don't know. Ever. Usually not to people you do know. I can think of a single situation for which I'd make an exception. No, I won't tell you what that situation is.

At any rate. I can't say for sure what the dude got out of the evening. So here's what I got out of it.

I met another guy (wearing a "Gay? Fine by me." shirt) who was helping me talk to the rude fellow. I am now Facebook friends with the GLBT-friendly shirt guy because he was really cool. So that's a plus.

I wasn't scared. I have been very fortunate in the past and never been sexually assaulted. I was in a well-lit house with plenty of people around who I feel would have intervened if a situation had arisen.

I was kinda excited. I don't get a lot of chances to address misogyny on a personal basis. I know that's not something I should hope for, but...

I feel like there's a slim chance I might have made the teensiest bit of difference in the way this guy will act in the future. Maybe. I hope.

Sometimes I get annoyed because I have no personal examples of how I've experienced misogyny in my life to pull out when I'm talking to people. I think it's fairly clear that showing how the patriarchy adversely affects someone they know can be the lightbulb for some people. So now I have a clear cut, personal example.

So. That was my Friday night.

Also, this guy looked like Captain Reynolds from Firefly! Too bad he was a dick.

Did I hear an echo?

This recent post from Shakesville is nifty-similar to some of the stuff I wrote about in my post explaining this blog's name. Especially:

"But movies about women are not about gems, plural; they are about diamonds in the rough. Diamonds who would never actually wear a diamond, because, eww, icky, stupid, that's what girly girls do.

It's because of that sort of messaging that there was a time I never would have worn pink shoes, no less blogged about them. I wanted to be one of the women who didn't care about being a woman, because those women aren't worth talking about. Their stories suck.

Suffice it to say, I've changed my mind."


Yes. This is where I was, and where I am and am heading now. Of course, Melissa said it about a trillion times better than I did. ^_^

Thursday, April 17, 2008

I was a teenage patriarchy-whore.

Update: I am not particularly happy with this post. It lacks sophistication, at the least, and at the worst it is probably somewhat offensive and definitely privileged. I am keeping it, as is, because I have yet to come up with a better way to explain the name of my blog. I am keeping the name of my blog because it would be a very big project to try to change it. Any links I'd ever posted anywhere would be broken, unless I searched them out and fixed them. Is that a good reason not to try to come up with something better? Not particularly. I apologize. If anyone ever actually comments or emails me to tell me that they find the title to be particularly upsetting, then I will make the effort.

Okay. So. A "patriarchy-whore."

This term is one that, as far as I know, I coined. I suppose it might have slipped into my brain from web-browsing, and if that's the case, my apologies for appropriating it.

A patriarchy-whore is a woman who, almost needless to say, whores herself out to the patriarchy. In exchange for the approval of the patriarchal system (i.e. "patriarchal pats on the head"), the P-W performs various acts of parroting, submission, and sucking up. There are very strong parallels between a "patriarchy-whore" and actual sex workers, but there are two important differences. One, money is necessary, while patriarchal approval is not. Two, it is possible to engage in sex work without demeaning oneself. The reverse is not true for patriarchy-whoring. Thus, a patriarchy-whore can be "reformed," because, honestly, there is no excuse or legitimate reason for reinforcing the patriarchy in the ways that a patriarchy whore does (examples to follow. I am NOT by any stretch of the imagination trying to slam anyone who conforms to patriarchal principles as a matter of survival).

How was I, in particular, a patriarchy-whore? Funny story...

In high school, I worked at a GameStop. If you don't know, or couldn't figure it out, they're a store that sells videogames. I don't know how widespread they are, nationwide, but they're all over the Midwest. They also now own EB Games, if you're familiar with that company.

Back to the story. I was the only woman on the staff. When I started, there was a 40-something manager dude (he was later fired for "loss prevention," i.e. skimming money off refunds), 5 or so 20-something dudes, and another high school age dude. I managed to get an interview only because my last name can be pronounced, at first glance, as "Booger," and thus the fellas thought it was hilarious. Then they met me and realize I actually play games (not to mention being hella responsible and organized and all that shit), and I was in.

I was ecstatic. The reasons for this are varied and complex, and trying to remember this from 5 years ago is not going to help me fill in all the details. But. Not only was I happy simply to have a job (it was the only offer I got, actually, out of all the ones I tried) - yay gas money! - but it was a job at a videogame store. And I was a girl. A high school girl, desperate for approval and to be "cool." And if you spend any time in the gamer world, or even just tangentially brush against it, you know that women gamers are touted as "hawt."

I realized, in very short order, that if I was vocal about liking the games they liked, I was rewarded. "Jamie, you're the most awesome girl I know!" "Jamie, I wish my girlfriend liked videogames like you do!" And these guys, these twenty-something, videogaming guys were hot. Or, well, two of them were, at least. ^_^ The slightest bit of praise that fell from their lips was like the fucking breath of life or something.

I started to discover more things I could do/say to get their approval. Like nodding along and agreeing when they dissed their girlfriends behind their backs. Talking about how much I hated girls. Saying that girls are catty, and dumb, and why can't they play videogames, why aren't girls more interesting. Agreeing that the catfight that happened in front of the store was hot (not shitting you).

As time at the store went on, I started to get invited to weekend Halo parties (Halo being, if you don't know, only one of the most popular/famous first-person-shooters ever. If you didn't play, you weren't a gamer, in the culture of this store. That's not to say they had bad taste. They also played awesome shit like Morrowind). In order to garner still more favor, I started spending my hard-earned cash (of which I barely made enough to get to and from work & school) on food for the guys. Whatever they wanted - pizza, White Castle, you name it.

I was their willing pet and servant.

And that's just one example of how I whored for the patriarchy. There were other ways, more subtle and common. Name-dropping my workplace, for one. If I wanted guys at school to notice me, pay attention to me, actually listen to what I had to say, I'd mention I worked at GameStop.

This behavior continued into college. I go to Michigan Technological University, which is a very science-oriented school. There are a lot of geeks/nerds/people-interested-in-my-interests here. I spent my freshman year building my geek cred and vacuuming up as many drooling, obsessed, nerdy guy fans as I could.

I should note that I'm not proud of this. And I haven't even started on all the things I did/said that were detrimental to my mental health. Denying things that I enjoyed/wanted that had the stigma of "too girly" so that I could be cool.

Even after I found a boyfriend, I still did these things. It wasn't until last summer ('07) that I found feminism and the concept finally started to sink in that I didn't need to act for male approval.

I suppose a better title would be "reforming patriarchy-whore." Sometimes I still catch myself doing these things. Especially with building geek cred. And especially when doing things, not because I particularly want to do them, but so that my significant other can brag about me to his buddies (this one has dropped off sharply, but I still think about it a lot. I've made huge strides in not acting on those thoughts, though. Due in large part to talking to him and realizing - yes, I'm dumb for not getting this on my own - that he would brag about me anyway because he loves me).

So. That's what a patriarchy-whore is, and that's why I'm a Reformed Patriarchy-Whore.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

WTF is a Patriarchy-Whore?

Just so that I actually force myself to sit down & type out the explanation at some point, and because I haven't posted in bit.

Soon.

Ish.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Not that I'm one to nitpick...

Oh wait. Yes I am. In fact, I ROCK the nitpicking. Check this out:

In our minds, Link was a hero with gravitas and personality, not a bland effeminate mute.

...

Behold: There once was a dream that was Hyrule, and Nintendo has castrated it.


Emphasis mine.

Do I have to go into the specifics of why this irks me? Because I'd really rather not. But seriously. Apparently "real" heroes can't be "effeminate." You know what? I'm just too tired. I'll let Karen sort you out.

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

I am momentarily inspired by ABW's Carnival of Allies to write a quick rant.

To people like this:

When you agree with me that [insert oppression of your choice here] is terrible, and that you can't believe people would do something like that, someone should teach those people that X is wrong, it needs to be stopped, etc., and when I offer you the opportunity to help out, by attending the Vagina Monologues, or Pride Week or MLK Jr. memorial presentations, or whatever, and you don't attend, YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.

If you are going to claim to be sympathetic to a movement, but then do ABSOLUTELY FUCKING NOTHING to show overt support for that movement, you are Full of Fail. On the order of EPIC.

I shall refer you to this post by Kate Harding. She talks about using her real name to blog. In the middle of this post, she calls out to men who will not stand up to sexism.

Read the post, and then realize that, when generalized to any and all oppressions, this probably applies to YOU. I know it applies to me. I hear comments regarding every underprivileged group under the sun, every day. And a lot of the time I don't call it out.

The difference between an ally (me) and someone like this (well-meaning folks who nevertheless cannot qualify as allies) is that if I possibly can, I DO call out the shit. And if I am directly asked to support a cause, I am so fucking there. I don't have time to do everything. Neither do the well-meaners. But I do something.

Aww, sadface

Re: A question about the military
from karnythia

AFAIK there is no such e-community. You may have to create one.

--- llencelynn wrote:
> Hello, karnythia,
>
> I'm terribly sorry to bother you, but your recent post at ABW (about the rape in the military) has been the first glimpse of something I've been searching for on the internet, and I was hoping you might be able to point me in the right direction. If I'm barking up the wrong tree, please don't hesitate to tell me so, and I'll return to my search.
>
> My significant other is in the Army. He is being deployed to Afghanistan soon. As someone who considers herself a progressive and a pacifist, I have oh-so-many issues revolving around war (especially this one) and the military. I don't know how to be sensitive to my dearest's choices and needs while still remaining true to my beliefs. It has, recently, provided me with a significant amount of unresolved anguish.
>
> What I would dearly love would be to find a community of other pacifist progressives (hell, even nonpacifist progressives would be a step up from my current situation) who have significant others in the military, so that I can converse with them and learn how to handle the serious mental stress that this is placing on both he and I.
>
> My question is: Do you know if such a place exists, and if so, where?
>
> Thank you so much for your time,
> Llencelynn


Okay, looks like it's time to get cracking. I might hold out a bit longer to see if I find someone else who might know. Pretty sure I'm about to start a project, though.

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

La poésie

Since I have no readership, I feel completely permitted to post whatever the hell I'd like. So here's a poem I wrote for my French class. I'm not going to translate it, either, though if I ever magically get a visitor, I'd be happy to do so at that time.

[Sans titre]

Je veux seulement changer le monde.
Est-ce trop demander?

Je veux seulement que les enfants n'affament pas,
Qu'elles* ont assez de nourriture pour survivre.

Je veux seulement qu'il y ait un leader honnête,
Qui a lutté dans sa vie.

Je veux seulement que La Terre survive l'humanité,
Et ne succombe pas à notre avidité.

Je veux seulement changer le monde.
Est-ce trop demander?

Je veux seulement mettre fin à la guerre,
Qui me menace de tuer mon amour.

Je veux seulemnt avoir le mariage pour tous,
Parce que l'amour ne peut pas être arreté.

Je veux seulement que le monde soit sans danger,
Pour que les personnes se sentent confortables chez elles.

Je veux seulement changer le monde.
Est-ce trop demander?

Je veux seulement changer le monde.
C'est une demande simple.
Je veux seulement changer le monde.
Pourquoi est-ce que c'est difficile d'aimer?
Je veux seulement changer le monde.
Je changerai le monde.


*I get really tired of having to face an existential crisis every time I am supposed to choose the masculine pronoun to describe a group or person of unknown gender. Therefore, to save myself the frustration, I chose to use the feminine pronoun in all cases. I feel that this choice is additionally justified by the disproportionate suffering faced by women and girls the world over, as detailed by Marilyn French's The War Against Women.

Not my original plan

I know I said I'd be posting about The Angry Black Woman, but I meant in a more thoughtful, considered way. Perhaps talking about myself as I address my white privilege, and how reading blogs like hers will help me in that.

But no.

Thanks to this asshat I get to sit here and scratch my head and think, "Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena...all turned out to be hoaxes? What the fuck kind of imaginary fantasy land does this dude live in?!"

Oh right, the kind where he thinks that's true:

We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena. And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.


Excuse me while I go vomit and wallow in the pain of sharing a species with this fella.

More linkage

I know it's probably bad form to just link to what others have said, rather than writing anything new, but this...

I Am Not My Cock

...was A-FUCKING-MAZING.

Should be posting soon on the reading I've been doing over at The Angry Black Woman. She rocks.

Sunday, April 06, 2008

Lurking just around the corner...

So, after reading the Misogyny In Real Life post at BitchPhD, I'm starting to get a little concerned.

I have lived a life shockingly free of blatant misogyny. There's the usual "hurhur I'm a college dude and I think boobies are awesome and totally not attached to humans and it's okay to say cunt in a mean way hurhur" types all over the place. That's sexism. As far as I've been aware, none of it has been directed at me (and I say this in the full awareness that as someone who vocally proclaims herself to be a feminist, there's probably a lot of shit going down behind my back that I don't know about). There's also the problems of the shitty (and global) ratio of women to men in my field (physics). There's the fact that the physics department at my college has zero women faculty (yeah, there are two listed on the site, but one of them I've never seen {some of the faculty have never seen her} and the other is an adjunct from another department. She's Chem, not Physics).

But these are things in my environment. I have never had misogyny directed at me. The more optimistic, or possibly uneducated or in-denial, person would look at this and say, "Sweet! Look at that, people don't suck so much after all! Sexism is finally on its way out! Yippee!"

Not I. I look at this life blissfully free of direct misogyny and I think, "Oh great. When's it going to happen, and how much is it going to suck."

Because really? Chances are it's gonna happen. And I feel like the longer it holds off, the worse it's going to get. I feel like The Patriarchy is cackling evilly to itself. "Haha, that silly Llencelyn! She thinks she can actually do well for herself! Haha! I'll show her! But I wait until it hurts." Like I'm going to get all the way through grad school or something and be fine, and then BAM! graduation day and my advisor decides that he doesn't want more women in the field and refuses to sign off on my thesis (or however it works) and I get raped the same day, violently, and my assailant goes free and I'm left a broken woman with no degree and a shattered world and my beloved leaves me (not that I think he would, but I'm putting my worst-case-scenario out there), and all this shit.

I mean, kinda ridiculous, but...also kinda not.

And it freaks me out. When is The Patriarchy going to dole out my dose of know-thy-place-woman?

Okay, am I crazy?

This is a LONG post. No, I mean REALLY LONG. It could take days to read... If I had any readers, that might actually concern me, but I don't, so... I'll do as I please. There is a shit-ton of backstory. If anyone ever actually reads this blog, AND reads through all this post, well... If you get to the end, I'd appreciate knowing whether my reaction makes sense to you. Until then, I'll just...stop talking to the void. ^_^


Also, I am very sorry that Blogger does not offer an option to hide the length of this post behind a cut. If I randomly get visitors to this blog someday, please don't look at this post and cry.

So. To begin.

My beloved is in the Army. He got to come visit me here at school for a couple of weeks as part of their "Hometown Recruiting" thing. Don't ask me for more details. Anyway, between classes I sometimes visited him in the ROTC building. One of these days, I had a paper bag with all of the stuff for the Technobabe Times (the feminist newsletter I help produce). One of beloved's superiors (hereafter referred to as MJ) came in and asked what was in the bag. I told him it was stuff for the TBT. Unsurprisingly, his reaction was, "You aren't a feminist, are you?" I won't bore you with the details of that conversation.

At any rate, after the March issue of the TBT got published, I decided it would be amusing to hand-deliver a copy to MJ. By the time I got around to it, I'd also written an article for the campus Women's Week. Here are the two articles I wrote, reproduced in full:


Damn Straight I'm A Feminist

When I told my now-boyfriend that I was a feminist, the first thing he said was, "You're not one of those feminists, are you?" By "those" feminists, he meant the image of a feminist that he had built up in his mind. A false image, based on one encounter with an embittered professor and the ridiculous stereotypes he'd heard throughout his life. I'm ashamed to say that my response was, "Oh, no! Don't worry, I'm not like that." Yup, that's what I said. So much for being strong and confident, right?

Why did I respond that way? Why did he respond that way? Who are "those" feminists? I don't know who they are. What I do know is that I am a feminist. I believe in equality for all people. I believe in an end to violence. I believe that women and men should have every opportunity available to them and that they should be able to make their own choices without social pressures.

I’ve never felt so strongly about any cause as I do about feminism. That’s probably because it’s the easiest one for me to identify with. I care about ending racism and poverty and any number of other social ills, but being the privileged white, heterosexual, middle class citizen that I am, I will never be able to understand firsthand what it is to face discrimination from those arenas. So, being female, feminism is the cause that caught my eye. The wonderful thing about it is that it opened my eyes and allowed me to be more understanding of the plights of groups who face different types of discrimination. It helped me to be aware of my privilege and to know that even if I don’t immediately understand where someone is coming from, they still deserve my respectful attention, and they deserve for me to think long and hard about what they've said, rather than just dismissing it because it doesn't immediately fit into my worldview. People who knew me in high school can tell that I’ve done a 180 between now and then. I’m proud to be a feminist, I care about problems in the world and want to act to make change. I’m a lot more informed than I’ve ever been in my life, and just all around a better, more accepting person.

Feminism has done this for me. Feminism has helped me grow and mature. It is still doing that, too, because I have a lot of growing and maturing left to do.
The reactions of others when they discover my feminism make it obvious that not everyone realizes what a wonderful thing it is. Some people have let stereotypes blind them to reality. Some have never really given feminism any thought. By experiencing feminism with me, my boyfriend is starting to learn that feminism has value. What I hope for is that if enough people understand the true purpose of feminism, then more people will be passionate about equality. When asked if I am a feminist, I want my response of, "Damn straight I'm a feminist!" to be the norm, rather than the exception.


The second article:



Why Women's Week Is Important to Everyone

More often than not, sexual violence (i.e. rape and sexual assault) is a topic that is filed under “Women’s Issues.” I propose that we change this categorization. Why? Well, because sexual violence isn’t an issue solely for the victims of a crime. It is an issue for the perpetrators as well. And according to the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics’ National Crime Victimization Survey Statistical Tables for 2005 (pg. 51), in rape, sexual assault, and verbal threats of those two items, 97.8% of offenders were male. Of the victims, 92% were female and 8% were male. Sexual violence is a women’s issue? Call me crazy, but...

Please don’t think I am accusing men of anything. The men I know are generally good people. A lot of them wouldn’t hurt a fly, let alone another person. Despite this, I find it frightening that men are so overwhelmingly the ones responsible for sexual violence. And in fact, men are the majority perpetrators of all the crimes of violence contained in the report. The highest percentage of female offenders was 22.7%, for simple (as opposed to aggravated) assault.

So what’s happening? For starters, most people just don’t realize that there is this great an imbalance. Most feminists could probably have quoted that statistic to you without a second’s thought, but the average person has no idea how skewed the demographic is. A very good friend of mine actually found these statistics in trying to refute my claim that I had every right to be more afraid of men than I am of women (the hypothetical situation was a dark parking lot at night). He was shocked to discover that my fear has a very sound statistical basis. So, the lack of “common knowledge” on this topic is a very big reason why this issue so hidden, and believed to be “just” a women’s issue.

What’s causing this trend? I’m not the person to answer that in any definitive way. I’m not a scholar of society. But I am a feminist. And as such, I’ve read a lot of the information about these topics that exists out there, and you know know what? Like blogger Twisty, “I blame the patriarchy.” Many, though of course not all, men are indoctrinated from an early age into a culture of violence - a culture that tells them it’s okay to hit, that violence and rape are funny. How could anyone be expected to turn out peaceful with that type of teaching?

And, unfortunately, men have, thus far, been very reluctant to hear this from women. Women’s advocate groups have been calling attention to this discrepancy for decades at the very least. Few people seem to have listened with anything like real interest.

So I say that it is time for men who believe that sexual violence is wrong (violence of any type, in fact) to step up to the plate. Join the ranks of women who are fighting to end this travesty. Begin teaching your brothers that rape is never funny. Talk to them about what sexual assault really means, and why really “being a man” should mean having a respect for other human beings.

Rise up, men! See the terrible culture of violence that has sprung up around us. See how it tears ours lives apart at the seams, how it destroys relationships, families, communities, and society. Realize that sexual violence is not a women’s issue, it is a human issue.

And then do something about it.

Crime statistics found at:
www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus05.pdf



Okay. Phew! Those were the articles. The next day, he emailed me a response (this isn't the part I "reacted" to).



Miss [Llencelyn],

First, great articles and well written.

Your article about, “Why women’s week is important to everyone” kind of blindsided me, I know you may find this hard to believe but being raised in a single parent home by my Mother, I was taught that violence against anyone was wrong and especially towards women. I cannot believe people actually believe rape is a women’s issue and not a human/cultural issue! That is like Larry the cable guy’s saying, “if guns kill people, I can blame my pencil for misspelled words” (Gun control is another issue). The same people who believe rape is a women’s issue are the same individuals who say, “She had it coming or, it is her own fault, look how she dresses!” Total Bullshit! Weak minded men are to blame for the statistics in your article!!

As far as your other article, “Damn straight I’m a feminist” I’m glad you feel as strongly as you do, it is refreshing to see young people stand up for what they believe in. This is one of the reasons I love the Army so much, I see young Americans everyday fired up about serving their country.

But I would have to disagree that you are a “Radical Feminist”. As I look at some of the definitions for Feminism, I would say you strike me more as a Global Feminist. [Here he is referring to a list of "Feminisms" that I took from a book I have called 33 things every girl should know about women's history.]

If I could offer some advice, as a future professional about to find work, I would be careful how you express your views, I am not saying don’t stand up for what you believe in, but sometimes it is good to keep your cards held close. I have learned a lot of hard lessons by, “Wearing my heart on my sleeve”

As they say, “Don’t talk religion and politics with friends”

MJ



Okay, fine. Also, all spelling or whatever is how it was in the original email. Here is how I responded:



[MJ],

Thank you for taking the time to read those articles. I really appreciate knowing that someone is actually reading those publications! I hope you also take the time to read the other articles in the TBT. They're all quality.

To respond:

I am happy to hear that you find arguments such as, "She had it coming," to be as ludicrous as I do. One of the many (many many many) goals of feminism is to create a world where NO ONE thinks such statements are reasonable. Unfortunately, though it may surprise kinder individuals, there are a very sad and unfortunate and sizable number of people (and even sadder how many of them hold positions of power!) who seem to believe that such ideas are legitimate. Even the way rape cases are investigated by the police demonstrate such beliefs. One of the first things a police officer will ask (unless, of course, s/he is socially conscious and knows how silly it is) is what the VICTIM was wearing, as opposed to, you know, what the PERPETRATOR was wearing. I hesitate to state that without support, but the situation is well-documented, so I think I'm alright. I'd be happy to assist you in looking up citations for my claims.

There is a very good skit that a friend of mine was discussing today, where an individual goes to the police to report that he was mugged. The police officer begins asking the types of questions that are typical in a rape case ("What were you wearing? Oh, a fancy suit? I see..." {insert look of disapproval}). Throughout the skit audience members often mutter, and even cry out in protest at the blatantly unfair treatment the victim is receiving. At the end of the skit, it is revealed that this process is what people who work up the courage to report a rape are facing. We're hoping to perform the skit next year for Women's Week. It's a great awareness raiser. Many people simply don't realize. And that's only the treatment that female rape victims face. Male rape victims are put in an even worse positions [Yeah, typo, I know. Cringe!] by a society that ignores and even outright denies their existence. There is also much documentation and literature on this topic. It is widely believed, among the groups that document such things, that male-victim rapes go drastically underreported, because of the censure male victims believe (rightly) that they are likely to face. And throughout all of this, the perpetrators of the rapes are left out of the focus, excused, defended ("He couldn't help himself!"), and generally given more leeway than animal abusers (I'm not kidding on this one. I'll try to find some of the articles I've read about this. It's terrible).

And, to get to a point I meant to make earlier, one of the largest obstacles to ending such lunacy is that people who, like yourself, understand how wrong it is to blame a victim rather than a perpetrator for a crime do not speak up. Thus, as in the "For A Male Reader" article in the TBT issue [I bummed this off of Kate Harding at Shapely Prose, with her permission.], the people who actually do hate, or who are confused, are left believing that their hatred/cruelty is okay, because no one is calling them on it. It is for this reason that I am striving to bring more people an understanding of feminism, civil rights, GLBT rights, global human rights violations, etc. These movements are not "crazy." They are sane and logical and they need all the support they can get. And I find that many people, once it's explained to them, are generally willing to help (my own self being a case in point. Until approximately a year ago, I would have scorned the feminist label. Then I learned).

As for the type of feminist that I am, I am going to disagree with you. I'll excuse your analysis through lack of familiarity with me. :) Really, the idea behind "feminisms" is that there are all these different "types" of feminism, but many people will identify with multiple feminisms, or choose no rigorous label at all. That is why I generally reject all of those labels in the TBT issue, and simply call myself a feminist. It is the most inclusive label I can come up with, though it has its own faults. The earlier feminists had a bad habit of excluding women of color and trans women (thus the evolution of the "womanist" label, and the tendency of trans women to identify more with GLBT groups than feminist groups). I most certainly strive not to exclude anyone.

As for the advice about expressing views. I very much appreciate the note of caution. I understand why it is important to consider. But, on the other hand, I feel that not enough people truly CARE precisely because too few people speak up about their beliefs. My fellow students think it's alright to be apathetic because they don't realize how many of their peers are passionate about various causes. I feel that if I can be extra, vocally, loudly passionate, then maybe it will wake up someone who is on the border. As for the professional world, I do realize that sometimes one has to keep quiet simply to find work. But on the other hand, I quite simply would not want to work in a place where I could not express my passion for basic human rights. Fortunately, I have privilege. When I am done with my education I will have a Ph.D. in Physics and a respectable undergraduate degree. I am confident enough in my intelligence and competence to believe that I will effectively be able to pick and choose where I would like to work. With that in mind, if I am rejected from a university (being a professor is my intention) simply for my views as a feminist, well I guess I would probably give them a cheerful "F*** you," and be on my way to a university that actually appreciates diversity and differing viewpoints and the struggle for progress and change.

A lesson I have learned since transitioning from high school to college and since undergoing some radical personal changes is that my friends are the foremost people with whom I should discuss religion, politics, etc. Had I not gone into a shell of non-discussion in high school, I could have skipped two and a half years of parroting the words of my father, rather than reading and researching and developing my own opinions. With whom would it be better to talk about deep, intense issues than a friend? A friend will listen and be polite, and I would be more inclined to reciprocate when speaking with a friend. I understand the concern that such discussions would cause rifts in the relationships, but I think that would only speak to the weakness of a bond. If the friendship (or whatever relationship) is truly strong, then such debate can only foster growth and a deeper commitment to the relationship. My best friend [CW] is a case in point here. Throughout high school we had radically different political views. But we discussed them. While we almost always disagreed, we were able to learn from each other, and have developed a deep, lasting friendship that I am confident will stay with us our whole lives.

I suppose this is probably more than you ever wanted to hear on these topics, but I guess your comments just inspired me! :) Again, thank you for taking the time to read those articles. I hope you continue to read the TBT in the future (there will be another issue this April), and I would love to continue any discussion of feminism, religion, politics, or whatever in which you might be interested.

Have a great Women's Week!
[Llencelyn]

P.S. You should come see the Vagina Monologues on Friday! 7:00pm (seating at 6:30pm) in M&M U115. It's free to enter, though donations are welcome. Any proceeds will go to support the Barbara Kettle Gundlach Shelter Home, so it's for a good cause. Plus, the Monologues are quite entertaining, and yours truly will be performing! :)



Okay. Yeah, I know, it's a lot of text. I'm sorry! :( Anyway, what follows this is the last email he sent in reply. I still haven't replied to it. It was sent... March 26th. I don't know if I'll ever reply. Here goes:



What are you majoring in that you can take the time to write all this down??



Kind of funny we have something in common. My father was a police officer turned lawyer/prosecutor and my mother is a corrections officer and the best man at my wedding was a military Police officer and is now a US Marshall. So when I hear about people being victimized, especially women and children, I want to ensure those who did it, no longer can, well really that they can no longer do anything at all, like walk, eat, stand or my favorite breath, once they stop doing that long enough, they are pretty much not a threat to anyone any longer. I support violence towards the violent!! Terrible isn’t it!! Oh I own guns and lots of them, absolutely appalling isn’t it!! Damn 2nd Amendment!!

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell



Your reply in itself is a great piece. I can appreciate your beliefs/opinions, but If I could share another hard lesson I have learned, is what we call, second and third order effects. Your pretty smart (I am not patronizing you either)so this is something you probably already know, especially since you are Physics major, but what you do and say now will have an impact on other people and the way they think and interact with you in the future. I get this all the time, obviously, I wear a uniform so I am just an idiot with no education and I couldn’t hack it in the real world so I join the military, well not so much of this is untrue, but the blowing things up is kind of cool too!! But I have a college degree and I can actually read, and this is going to sound terrible but I believe my beliefs are more important then others because I have sacrificed my freedoms for the greater good and I have also paid for them by serving my country. Terrible view isn’t it!!



Freedom is not free.



There are 300 million Americans wishing the world was a better place, there are 500,000 of us in the Army making it one.



Hey wait does that make us Global Feminist???



I appreciate the invite to the Vagina Monologues, but I am more of western/action/shooter fan.



Good discussion, you ever thought about Philosophy?



We could have a cool discussion about this over some hard boiled eggs and beer at the dog [a local bar] when [MJ's name for my beloved] was here.



And we're done with the lengthy! Yay! But MJ's last email sent me over the fucking edge. I kid you not, I stormed about campus in a blind rage for pretty much the whole day. I have never been so angry about something in my own life (I'm always getting enraged about the crap I read about online, of course).

Am I crazy, or does it sound like two totally different people wrote his two emails? I mean, seriously! His first article was something that I could read and reply to. I didn't agree with everything he said, and some of his thoughts seemed, to me, a bit naive, but it was all in a tone that said, "We're going to have a cool discussion about our political views!" Right?

His second email was... My first thought was, "Were you drunk?" My second thought was, "Are you 15?" (Nothing against 15-year-olds. I was a spectacularly stupid one, myself, so I project that state onto the age. I know there are smart ones, though.)

His second email must have been typed in haste, or something. It was barely legible, in comparison to the first. Also, it was at least five times as patronizing (sorry, but when you say, "I am not patronizing you..." well, that usually means that you are).

I will admit that I did not address all of the points he made in his first email (my response was long enough as it was!) but I tried to hit on some of them, at least. But his second email didn't say anything new. He repeated the same things he'd said before, blowing right over my own thoughts. He replied to nothing I'd said.

Also, he assumed that I don't believe people should be allowed to own guns. I may personally be filled with gut-wrenching nausea at the idea of even being in a room with one, but that doesn't mean other people shouldn't get to have them. That annoys me.

So, basically, I feel slighted. In a big way. This guy is supposed to be an adult. He even said that he dislikes the stereotype of Army people being dumb by noting his college education. So why did he dismiss my reply like he did? Did he? I am pretty sure I'm not crazy, but there's always a chance.

The only reasonable explanation I've had offered so far (aside from him just being an ass, which I am fairly sure isn't true) is that he needs to have a simplified worldview. This guy has done at least one tour in Iraq. The theory was proposed to me that if MJ tried to think about the world in any shades of grey, he wouldn't be able to cope with the horrors and atrocities he's witnessed and maybe even committed. I'm willing to accept that. See my previous thoughts about how my beloved might not want to hear good arguments for the War being wrong/in vain. But if that is the case, then I wish he would have handled this differently. Why attempt to start a dialogue, as he seemed to in his first email, if you don't keep it up? If he had just said, "Nice articles," and left it at that, that'd have been fine. Did he not expect me to reply? Did he think his stunning intellect would leave me speechless with a strong desire to return to the kitchen?

ARGH.

Seriously. Am I crazy?

Saturday, April 05, 2008

Headdesk

http://bitchphd.blogspot.com/2005/08/misogyny-in-real-life.html

Just...read the comments. Try not to break anything.